How AI Is Revolutionizing Deposition Summaries

Managing depositions has become more complex. Legal teams face tighter timelines, growing caseloads, and a growing need for strategic insights. Summarizing a transcript accurately is no longer enough. Teams must extract critical information faster to build strong cases and negotiate better outcomes.

While traditional court reporting remains essential, many legal professionals are seeking new ways to manage the pressure. AI technology is playing a key role in meeting this need. It helps uncover contradictions, track admissions, and surface hidden patterns that manual review might miss.

If you are not yet using AI tools in your practice, you could be at a disadvantage. Early adopters are already finding ways to streamline their review process, reduce costs, and sharpen their strategies. In a field where every advantage counts, having smarter tools on your side is no longer an option, but a necessity.

The Shift in Deposition Management: Why Traditional Methods Fall Short

Legal teams have relied on traditional methods for decades to create deposition summaries:

Court reporters provide accurate transcripts.
Attorneys and paralegals review the material manually to create summaries.

These practices are still important, but they no longer meet the demands of modern litigation.

The volume of deposition material is expected to increase according to Norton Rose Fulbright's 2025 Annual Litigation Trends Survey. In complex cases, a single matter may involve dozens or even hundreds of depositions. Manual review takes time and can strain internal resources. Fatigue and time pressure increase the risk of missing contradictions, incomplete admissions, or subtle shifts in testimony.

The pace of litigation has also changed, with the 2024 Report on the State of the US Legal Market by Thomson Reuters noting that clients demand greater efficiency and faster results from law firms. Courts, corporate clients, and regulators expect faster turnaround times. Legal teams must now move from deposition to action quickly. Delays in analyzing testimony can impact settlement negotiations, trial strategies, and discovery compliance.

Without support from smarter tools, even strong teams risk falling behind. Manual summaries, no matter how skilled the reviewer, cannot always keep up with the scale, speed, and strategic pressure modern cases demand. The need for deeper, faster, and more accurate insights is pushing firms and corporate legal departments to seek new solutions.

The Growing Challenges for Legal Teams Without AI Support

Legal teams that rely only on manual deposition review face growing risks. As caseloads expand and expectations tighten, it becomes harder to sustain the old ways of working.

Some of the biggest challenges include:

Review Fatigue and Missed Details: Manually reviewing long transcripts leads to fatigue. Even the most experienced reviewers can miss key admissions, inconsistencies, or contradictions when time is short and pressure is high.
Delayed Case Strategies: Building a strong case often depends on identifying issues early. When deposition analysis takes too long, it delays follow-up depositions, discovery motions, and settlement negotiations.
High Labor Costs: Manual transcript review requires a great deal of resources. It demands significant attorney or paralegal time, driving up litigation costs and pulling focus from higher-value work.
Scaling Problems in Complex Matters: In multidistrict litigation, construction defect cases, and other high-volume matters, manual review can slow entire case timelines. Legal teams may struggle to keep up with hundreds of depositions without falling behind.
Loss of Strategic Advantage: When the other side uses smarter tools to find contradictions and admissions faster, teams without AI are at a disadvantage. Small gaps in preparation can create bigger risks at trial or during settlement talks.

These challenges are not theoretical. They are already reshaping how cases are managed. Teams that embrace smarter review methods now will be better positioned to meet today’s demands and tomorrow’s expectations.

Stay tuned for Part II of this blog series which will feature information about how agentic AI is transforming deposition summaries.

Related Resources

AI Adoption in Law Firms: Navigating Challenges and Opportunities for Sustainable Growth

For leaders at law firms, the strategic question isn't whether to adopt AI, it's how to harness the advantages of AI effectively to boost your practice today while your competitors are still evaluating their options.

The Deposition Process Explained: A Legal Team’s Guide

Learn what legal professionals need to know about the deposition process, from scheduling and questioning to transcript review and post-depo strategy.

Lawyers Must Embrace Legal AI to Meet Client Expectations

Why Lawyers Must Embrace AI Legal Technology to Meet New Client Expectations

The legal industry is at a critical juncture, where adopting legal AI is no longer a choice but a necessity.