Remote vs. In-Person Depositions
March 23, 2022
Court Reporting
Weighing Your Options: Tips for Deciding Between Remote and In-Person Depositions
There are benefits to each approach so here is a quick guide to evaluating specific needs of your case and witness to determine if a deposition should be taken in person or remotely.
Top 3 Advantages To Remote Depositions |
Top 3 Advantages To In-Person Depositions |
Save time and money | Critical witness/bet the company case |
Speed up discovery schedules | Reduces the possibility of witness coaching |
Protect medically vulnerable participants | Better ability to build rapport/assess credibility |
When to consider remote depositions
Perhaps the most compelling reason to continue to take depositions remotely, even post-pandemic, is cost. Remote removes all travel costs, and attorneys find they can conduct more depositions in a short amount of time. Susman Godfrey trial lawyer Andres C. Healy’s team conducted 15 virtual depositions in one three-week span due to Covid-19 and found that they reduced costs by up to one-third. As we all know once your clients get used to these kinds of cost reductions it can be difficult to go back. Going remote with your depositions can also speed up discovery schedules by reducing scheduling conflicts with the other side.
Another reason to consider remote deposition is the court reporter shortage. There is a severe shortage of court reporters in the United States. STTI reports that 1,120 stenographers retire every year while only 200 enter the field each year. At the same time, the litigation market continues to grow year over year. What does this have to do with remote? Court reporters can take more depositions in a day if they work remotely. So, you may choose to go remote if a court reporter isn’t available in person on your desired date and time.
The in-person advantage
On the other hand, nothing beats an in-person deposition for critical witnesses in bet-the-company cases or if you’ve got an adversarial opposing counsel and have concerns about witness coaching. Many attorneys also report that they can build rapport and assess credibility more easily in person. And of course, the possibility of computer glitches goes way down – if you have a witness who struggles with technology or internet connectivity then in-person should be considered. Another situation where being in-person is preferable is when a witness requires an interpreter. A deposition can certainly be taken remotely with an interpreter but it is preferable to be in person in this situation. Lengthy depositions are also better done in person – no one wants to sit on a videoconference for 7 hours a day, it is just too exhausting.
Conclusion
Whether it is COVID or something else, disruptions will continue to happen that may prevent in-person depositions and due to cost and time constraints, it is widely believed that some portion of depositions will remain virtual. The smart move right now is to evaluate the specific needs of your witnesses and cases and determine if you and your client are better served by an in-person or remote proceeding.

Articles
Court Reporting
Leverage Your Team While Taking a Deposition
Here are five ways you can leverage your office team while taking a deposition.
Read More
Articles
Remote Proceedings
The Admissibility of Remote Video Deposition Testimony
Proper protocols and an experienced remote deposition provider help avoid the pitfalls of having a remote deposition not be admissible in court.
Read More
WhitePapers
Remote Proceedings
Efficient and Secure Remote Deposition Technology
The legal profession finds itself, like most other industries, undergoing major disruption. This guide looks at recent developments in legal technology.
Read More