Skip To Content
Free Trial Now Available! Deposition Insights+ AI-Enabled Transcript Analysis Platform Learn more

Subpoena for Medical Records: What Legal Teams Should Know

August 20, 2025

Record Retrieval

Subpoena for Medical Records

Medical records are often essential in litigation, especially in cases involving injury, malpractice, or disability claims. However, legal teams frequently hit roadblocks when relying on patient consent alone. Requests may be denied, ignored, or legally insufficient, delaying case timelines and increasing administrative work. A subpoena is often the best or only path forward in these situations.

Understanding how to use subpoenas to access protected health information (PHI) is essential to keeping discovery on track. This article outlines what legal teams need to know about subpoenas, compliance pitfalls, and how to simplify the process with professional medical record retrieval support.
 

When a Subpoena Becomes Necessary

Legal teams cannot always count on patient cooperation. In some cases, an opposing party refuses to authorize release, or a provider rejects incomplete or overly broad consent forms. When that happens, subpoena power becomes the primary tool for record access.

A subpoena is necessary when:
  • Patients are slow to sign authorized releases or cannot be reached
  • Providers reject vague or improperly worded forms
  • Records contain sensitive data requiring court oversight
  • Adversarial parties have no direct authority to request information
  • Consent would expose third-party or privileged details

What Type of Subpoena Do You Need?

Not all subpoenas are designed to retrieve records. Knowing the difference helps ensure compliance and avoids costly do-overs.
  • Subpoena duces tecum: Demands production of documents, including medical records. This is the standard subpoena used for medical record retrieval.
  • Subpoena ad testificandum: Requires a person to appear and testify. This type is not used by Lexitas’s records division but may be relevant in process service.
Only a subpoena duces tecum is typically used to obtain medical records. It must be properly drafted and served in accordance with state laws and the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA).

In some jurisdictions, legal teams may also use a notice of deposition upon written questions alongside the subpoena. This approach helps authenticate records without requiring oral testimony and is sometimes incorporated into the records retrieval process when necessary.
 

HIPAA Rules and State-Specific Nuances

Under HIPAA, providers may release records in response to a subpoena without patient authorization when one of the following specific conditions are met. This preserves the privacy of PHI, even under legal compulsion.
  • Provide proof of patient notification with time to object
  • Submit a qualified protective order (QPO) signed by a court
  • Include a valid HIPAA authorization when possible
  • Demonstrate that disclosure is limited and necessary
Some states go further. California, Arizona, and the District of Columbia require enhanced notification steps, and many jurisdictions impose added rules for mental health or substance use records. In complex cases, outsourced record retrieval for lawyers ensures compliance across jurisdictions and reduces the risk of inadmissible records.
 

What Delays or Derails a Subpoena?

Subpoenas can fail if they are not properly served, signed, or written. Common issues include missing details or requesting records too broadly, which can trigger provider objections or court pushback.
  • Incomplete patient information (e.g., wrong date of birth or spelling errors)
  • Missing QPO or improper notification
  • Requests considered unduly burdensome
  • Jurisdictional mistakes (wrong court, missing signatures, etc.)
  • Unclear scope or vague record descriptions
Certain types of records,such as psychotherapy notes, addiction treatment, or out-of-state files,can also take longer to obtain. To avoid delays, many legal teams outsource medical record retrieval services and rely on partners experienced in subpoena protocol.
 

Drafting and Serving Subpoenas Effectively

A legally sound subpoena does more than demand records. It anticipates objections and meets every procedural requirement to speed up provider response.

To correctly draft a subpoena:
  • Confirm legal authority in the issuing jurisdiction
  • Accurately name the patient and record custodian
  • Clearly state the records requested and applicable date range
  • Include a valid signature and proof of service
  • Allow sufficient time for response or objection
Serving the subpoena properly is just as important. Each state has rules about who can serve, how notice is given, and what timelines apply. Avoiding clerical missteps prevents unnecessary hearings or quashed subpoenas.
 

The Value of a Record Retrieval Partner

Legal teams increasingly turn to trusted medical records retrieval companies to manage subpoena-based workflows. This partnership reduces administrative burden and ensures documents are obtained quickly and compliantly.

A medical records retrieval company can:
  • Prepare and serve subpoenas on behalf of the legal team
  • Coordinate with providers to address missing documents or errors
  • Track delivery timelines and escalate if necessary
  • Upload records securely through HIPAA-compliant platforms
  • Abstract and summarize documents when needed
An experienced retrieval partner like Lexitas helps eliminate bottlenecks, reduces staff time spent on follow-up, and lowers the risk of violating state or federal laws.
 

Need help managing subpoenas and coordinating the retrieval of medical records?


Subpoena vs. Authorization: Choosing the Right Tool

Each method has tradeoffs. Where parties are cooperative and time is short, authorization may be sufficient. But in contentious or high-stakes litigation, subpoenas offer better enforceability and reliability.
 

Method

Best Use Case

Key Limitations

Authorization Routine or cooperative requests May be rescinded or ignored
Subpoena Adversarial discovery or unresponsive party Requires compliance with legal process

Legal teams should evaluate early whether consent will suffice or a subpoena will be required to avoid delay. Using the wrong approach can cause unnecessary backtracking and missed deadlines.
 

Don’t Let Subpoenas Stall Your Discovery Timeline

Getting medical records through subpoenas is not always straightforward, but it doesn't have to be a burden. The right process and partners can turn a common challenge into a source of advantage.
  • Strategic planning helps teams stay ahead of court deadlines.
  • Properly managed subpoenas reduce costs and delays.
  • Working with a retrieval provider ensures every request is legally sound.
Lexitas helps legal teams manage subpoena workflows from start to finish. With HIPAA-compliant tools, nationwide service, and deep knowledge of state-specific requirements, Lexitas delivers record access that’s timely, secure, and litigation-ready.

Related Resources

5 things you should know about ordering medical records

Articles

Record Retrieval

What to Know About Ordering Medical Records

Learn how legal teams order medical records online, avoid delays, and stay HIPAA-compliant. Discover why top firms trust Lexitas for fast, secure retrieval.

Read More
When is the right time to outsource your records retrieval services?

Articles

Record Retrieval

When is the right time to outsource your records retrieval services?

Making the decision to outsource your records collection can be a challenging one. However, there are many benefits to doing so.

Read More
medical chronologies and summaries

Articles

Record Retrieval

Unlocking Efficiency in Medical Record Review: How Record Insights® Transforms Case Preparation

In litigation involving medical issues, attorneys often face reviewing thousands of pages of medical records. Record Insights® helps transform the way professionals approach medical chronologies and summaries.

Read More